evidoria

What works in Cape Town

All catalogues · South Africa profile

26
evaluated practices
64/100
average quality score
17%
strong evidence, of 24 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Cape Town

Drawn from: ABALOBI — Co-Designing an Offline-First Digital Toolkit With South Africa's Small-Scale Fishers · SmartCape – Cape Town's Municipal Library Digital Access and Skills Programme · Working for Water (South Africa) · Cape Town Central City Improvement District — 25 Years of Levy-Funded Urban Turnaround · VPUU — Violence Prevention through Urban Upgrading in Khayelitsha, Cape Town · WHO mRNA Technology Transfer Programme — Afrigen's Cape Town Hub-and-Spoke Vaccine Network · South Africa's Women's Budget Initiative — Parliament-led gender analysis of the national budget (1995–2000) · UCT Research Contracts & Innovation — University of Cape Town's Technology Transfer Office

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +38 pts 44 here · 6 average

Equity & inclusion +33 pts 83 here · 50 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +29 pts 78 here · 48 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +16 pts 73 here · 57 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +11 pts 85 here · 74 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Inclusiveness / equity +9 pts 52 here · 43 average

Weaknesses

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -16 pts 11 here · 28 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality -21 pts 50 here · 71 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -54 pts 0 here · 54 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 48
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
44 · 6
Equity & inclusion
83 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
78 · 48
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Evidence of impact / measured results
73 · 57
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
85 · 74
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Inclusiveness / equity
52 · 43
Innovation level
66 · 62
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Transferability / replicability
60 · 60
Scalability & sustainability
60 · 62
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Efficiency
25 · 33
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Sustainability (ongoing)
67 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
11 · 28
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Impact on gender equality
50 · 71
Transparency, fairness & accountability
0 · 54

Coloured bar: Cape Town. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

ABALOBI — Co-Designing an Offline-First Digital Toolkit With South Africa's Small-Scale Fishers · 96

SmartCape – Cape Town's Municipal Library Digital Access and Skills Programme · 96

Working for Water (South Africa) · 87

Cape Town Central City Improvement District — 25 Years of Levy-Funded Urban Turnaround · 86

VPUU — Violence Prevention through Urban Upgrading in Khayelitsha, Cape Town · 86

WHO mRNA Technology Transfer Programme — Afrigen's Cape Town Hub-and-Spoke Vaccine Network · 81

South Africa's Women's Budget Initiative — Parliament-led gender analysis of the national budget (1995–2000) · 78

UCT Research Contracts & Innovation — University of Cape Town's Technology Transfer Office · 76

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more